1. Current Events
The 119th Congress is currently considering H.R. 5587, a bill to modify the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970. By proposing to waive certain federal drilling permits and create new exemptions from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), lawmakers are revisiting a decades-old debate: how to balance the speed of energy development with federal oversight of public lands.
2. The Historical Parallel
This tension between industrial output and environmental review was a central theme during the 91st Congress with the passage of the Clean Air Amendments of 1970. While the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was established earlier that year via executive action, this Act gave the federal government broad new powers to regulate air quality. Like today’s geothermal proposals, the 1970 Act and its subsequent updates were shaped by the need to manage national resources during periods of shifting energy demands.
3. What Happened - And What Changed
The evolution of the Clean Air Act (CAA) moved the U.S. from a system of voluntary state research to a mandatory federal regulatory structure:
Clean Air Amendments of 1970 (P.L. 91-604): Established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)—federal limits on pollutants like lead and carbon monoxide.
Effect: This led to measurable reductions in urban smog and forced the adoption of technologies like the catalytic converter in cars.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 (P.L. 95-95): Created the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program.
Effect: This required a "preconstruction review" for new factories to ensure that areas with naturally clean air (like national parks) did not see their air quality drop to the bare minimum federal limit.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (P.L. 101-549): Introduced a market-based "cap-and-trade" system to reduce acid rain and phased out chemicals that damage the ozone layer.
Effect: These changes significantly reduced sulfur dioxide emissions and altered daily life by changing the chemicals used in common household aerosols and refrigerants.
4. How it Connects to Today
H.R. 5587 seeks to reduce the role of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in the permitting process for geothermal energy on non-tribal lands. Just as the 1977 and 1990 amendments adjusted the "permitting burden" for specific industries, this bill aims to increase the pace of energy production by removing certain federal reviews.
The Impact of H.R. 5587: This legislation would allow developers to bypass the Federal Drilling Permit and NEPA review for "certain activities," such as test drilling or site preparation.
Potential Benefits: Supporters argue this will encourage more geothermal projects, which provide a consistent source of renewable energy.
Potential Burdens: Critics point out that removing NEPA reviews reduces the opportunity for the public to voice concerns and may increase the risk of localized soil or water issues that a federal review might have identified. Additionally, reducing federal oversight may increase the administrative or legal workload for state agencies and federal courts if project impacts are challenged later.
5. Key Facts / Reference Block
Historical Law/Event Clean Air Amendments of 1970 (Public Law 91-604)
Year 1970
Congress 91st Congress
Current Parallel H.R. 5587 — Geothermal Steam Act Amendment
Official Source https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/5587
6. Closing Thoughts
History suggests that changes to environmental review processes often lead to a "wait and see" period. Whether H.R. 5587 results in a faster transition to renewable energy or creates new environmental challenges will likely depend on how the Department of the Interior defines the specific "exempt activities" allowed under the new rules.
The Ledger is Closed,
LegisLedger | Civic Intelligence. Clearly Delivered.
Legal Disclosures & Compliance Physical Address: LegisLedger Media LLC | [PO Box 284] | [Peebles, Ohio 45660]
Copyright: © 2026 LegisLedger. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted without express written permission.
DMCA Notice: To report intellectual property infringement, please contact our designated agent at [[email protected]].
Privacy & Transparency You are receiving this because you opted in at [thelegisledger.org].
We value your data privacy; review our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Keep the LegisLedger independent. We accept no lobbyist or corporate funding. If you value non-partisan data, consider supporting our mission: buymeacoffee.com/TheLegisLedger