1. Executive Summary
This legislation amends Title 46 of the U.S. Code to authorize the President to prohibit vessels from entering U.S. ports if they have previously transited maritime facilities in the Western Hemisphere that were nationalized or expropriated from U.S. persons.
2. What This Bill Would Do
Establish Designation Criteria: Under Section 2(2), the President may designate specific ports or terminals in Western Hemisphere countries (holding U.S. free trade agreements) as "expropriated" if the facility or its access land was seized from a U.S. owner.
Prohibit Entry: Amends 46 U.S.C. § 70022 to bar vessels that have transited a designated facility from operating in U.S. navigable waters or transferring cargo at U.S. ports (Section 2(1)(C)).
Owner Authorization Provision: A vessel is exempt from this entry prohibition if the U.S. person who previously owned or controlled the seized facility provides express authorization for the vessel's transit (Section 2(1)(C)(iii)(II)).
Safety & Emergency Exceptions: Entry is permitted in cases of onboard emergencies involving the vessel or an individual (Section 2(1)(C)(iii)(I)).
Mandatory Removal of Designation: The President is required to lift the restricted status if ownership is restored, "adequate and effective" compensation is provided, or the dispute is resolved (Section 2(3)).
3. Who is Affected
Maritime Logistics: Operators must verify the "Designated List" against their port history to maintain U.S. eligibility.
U.S. Property Claimants: Individuals or companies with outstanding expropriation claims in the Western Hemisphere.
International Trade Partners: Nations with U.S. FTAs may face secondary economic impacts if their nationalized infrastructure triggers U.S. port restrictions.
Global Supply Chains: Potential for increased shipping costs or transit delays if vessels are rerouted to avoid designated hubs.
4. Existing Law vs. What Would Change
Feature | Existing Law (46 U.S.C. § 70022) | Under H.R. 7084 |
Entry Basis | Safety, security, and environmental standards. | Adds property rights history as a condition for entry. |
Trigger Mechanism | Active vessel violations. | Historical transit of a designated foreign facility. |
Executive Power | General regulatory oversight. | Authority to designate and remove specific foreign ports. |
Legal Protections | Standard diplomatic/legal channels. | Stay of Action: Property cannot be designated while FTA arbitration is pending. |
5. Fiscal & International Impact
Administrative: Requires U.S. Coast Guard and CBP system updates to track "Designated List" compliance.
Trade Relations: Critics of similar measures often cite the risk of retaliatory trade barriers or "tit-for-tat" port restrictions from affected Western Hemisphere partners.
The following primary sources were used to synthesize this report. LegisLedger does not use secondary news commentary for bill breakdowns.
6. LegisLedger Source Ledger
Document Type | Source Agency | Identifier / Link |
Primary Bill Text | House of Representatives | |
Current Statute | U.S. Code |
The Ledger is Closed,
LegisLedger | Legislative Intelligence. Transparent. Neutral.
Legal Disclosures & Compliance Physical Address: LegisLedger Media LLC | [PO Box 284] | [Peebles, Ohio 45660]
Copyright: © 2026 LegisLedger. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted without express written permission.
DMCA Notice: To report intellectual property infringement, please contact our designated agent at [[email protected]].
Privacy & Transparency You are receiving this because you opted in at [thelegisledger.org].
We value your data privacy; review our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Keep the LegisLedger independent. We accept no lobbyist or corporate funding. If you value non-partisan data, consider supporting our mission: buymeacoffee.com/TheLegisLedger